Click through to save this country!
Lord Nazh claims he quit blogging at least for now...read here
| Wednesday, November 14, 2007 |
| San Francisco, Mexico |
Can we start the process of annexing SF to Mexico yet ?(11-13) 15:56 PST San Francisco - -- The Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to
issue municipal identification cards to city residents - regardless of whether
they are in the country legally - and to double the amount of public money
available to candidates running for supervisor. Supervisor Tom Ammiano, who authored the ID card legislation, said the program is a smart public safety measure because it would make residents living on the social margins of San Francisco more likely to seek the help of police and could give them more access to banking services. "People are afraid to report crimes," Ammiano said, referring to illegal immigrants who avoid local law enforcement authorities over fear of being arrested or deported by federal immigration officials. [link]
'Smart' legislation to help ILLEGAL immigrants get police help (the border is south) and access to banking... That's awfully nice of the scumbagsupervisor isn't it? Of course you knew that the kooks would have to one-up Spitzer's plan to get all illegals driver's licenses (even Spitzer has given up now), I wonder if this plan will carry the same backlash as that did [this is Cali, so doubtful].
With the blatant disrespect for the country, it's laws, it's values and it's people; San Francisco once again shows it is on the cutting edge of insanity. The main reason ILLEGALS are not reporting crime is because it doesn't make sense for a CRIMINAL to report illegal activity and get involved with the police. I would like to think that this ID card is the first step to finding the ILLEGALS and removing them from US soil; of course I'd like to think that the lottery is going to pick me to win (without a ticket even) but wishes don't always come true.
Now Folsom can have it's annual S&MDeviantFreakGay Pride festival with an Illegal float, at least there's something to look forward to heh. [h/t drudge]
tag: San Francisco, illegal immigrants, idiot Democrat politician, Blogpower, Lord NazhLabels: idiocy, illegal immigration, Mexico, San Francisco |
 posted by Lord Nazh @ 06:05 | View blog reactions |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, April 17, 2007 |
| Kirked (update) |
A resolution in the kirk'd case:
Attorneys for JL Kirk & Assocs. contacted Media Bloggers Association attorney Ronald Coleman shortly after receiving his letter stating that the MBA was representing me in this dispute on Thursday afternoon. Both sides expressed their wish to avoid litigation or further aggravation of the situation. JL Kirk’s main concern at the outset was that we communicate their position - which is different from the information originally told to me by a JL Kirk employee - that JL Kirk is not a continuation of the defunct Bernard Haldane company, either in terms of corporate identity or stock ownership, and that JL Kirk’s principal, Kirk Leipzig, is only a former Bernard Haldane employee but did not buy any assets or stock of Bernard Haldane. I can’t vouch for the truth of that statement because I have no first-hand knowledge of the facts, but evidently anyone who wants more information can obtain it from JL Kirk. (link)
Head on over and read the rest (and the comments).
Labels: idiocy, law |
| posted by Lord Nazh @ 20:32 | View blog reactions |
|
|
|
| Thursday, April 12, 2007 |
| Kirked |
Want to become an internet verb? Just follow along with this 'idea':
Original Text of Demand Letter Pg 1 Original Text of Demand Letter Pg 2 [Original on Letterhead from King & Ballow Law Offices]
CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Ms. Katherine Coble ADDRESS BLACKOUT Hermitage, Tennessee 37076 Re: Your Blog: “Just Another Pretty Farce” February 27, 2007 posting regarding JL Kirk Associates (R) Dear Ms. Coble: This firm represents JL Kirk Associates. In the February 27, 2007, posting to your blog “Just Another Pretty Farce” you made the following false and defamatory statements about JL Kirk Associates: (link)
Read the rest of the post (and at various other places) and you'll see what I mean by becoming a verb.
Labels: idiocy, law |
| posted by Lord Nazh @ 14:38 | View blog reactions |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, March 20, 2007 |
| Traitors !!! or Misguided??? |
I think I'm just about done with;
1.) liberals complaining that the Right is questioning their Patriotism when it comes to the War and combating Terrorism.
2.) people on the Right reflexively stating that we're not questioning their Patriotism, we're questioning their judgement.
Now, by-and-large I really do try to question the person's judgement instead of their underlying motives.
BUT ...
I think the past year (and recent events such as this weekend) have gradually started pushing me to question their Patriotism ( and to hell with their judgement) !!!
Case in point... Rosie O' Donnell
Rosie has been out there with many recent statements.
Here she laments Khalid Sheikh Muhammed (KSM) being robbed of his "humanity"
Check out HotAir's recap on this and her distortions.
She went nuclear on Elizabeth Hasselbeck because she (Hasslebeck) called KSM a "terrorist,".
Rosie O'Donnell said, and I quote...
"Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah! You're going to rob him of his humanity now. You want to rob him of his humanity by calling him a terrorist."
Hmmm...the guy who planned the '93 WTC bombing and 9/11 - as well as Jose Padilla's mission - which all resulted in ( or attempted to result in) the deaths of thousands of innocent people (each of whom was robbed of more than just their "humanity"), is somehow just some innocent guy who was walking down Rodeo Drive and snatched up and "robbed of his humanity"?
Is she serious?? If it were left to just this comment I'd state that she was a few sandwiches short of a picnic.
In any other war these non-uniformed combatants would've been lined up and shot right there on the battlefield. For some reason Rosie thinks we should treat them like college students playing a prank instead of real killers trying to annihilate a nation.
But it gets better...
Apparently Rosie thinks 9/11 was an "inside job"...
So - its not a big leap to see where she's going with this. Apparently Pres. Bush ordered 9/11 in order to destroy WTC 7 and the files concerning Enron and WorldCom but to cover it up, we had to destroy the twin towers too.
Forget the fact that its impossible for 9/11 to be an inside job. Apparently her Bush-hatred has rendered her delusional. Or is she??
So - she thinks Bush ordered 9/11 and thinks we should be playing patty-cake with terrorists.
She has made repeated statements that Christianity is more dangerous than radical Islam.
She has repeatedly bad-mouthed this country in its war on terror even though, should we succumb to jihad, she'd be one of the first people executed by Al-Qaeda (for being homosexual).
Think I should still just be questioning her judgement?
I don't ... she is being politically calculating in her statements.
I no longer question her judgement. I am here and now...
Questioning her Patriotism.
You (dear reader) can do as you like. But I will no longer play the aforementioned "patriotism game" with Rosie.
Want some more patriots to fawn over?
Ok...
There was a recent anti-war protest in D.C. this weekend. The moonbats had planned to start at the Vietnam War Memorial and then go from there. Well...at the last anti-war march in D.C. the moonbats defaced the Capitol steps with spray-paint. Fearing the defacement of the Vietnam Wall, a Gathering of Eagles was formed to protect it.
A nice write-up of the counter-protest is here;
Another is here;
Here's a nice write-up by the American Thinker;
My buddy who went tells me that the anti-war protestors kept riding the metro trains back to the beginning of the march to give the illusion of a larger crowd than really was. This makes sense since the US Capitol police no longer gives estimates on crowd size but the DC Metro authority is used to get an estimated crowd size by examining rider-ship for the day vs. an average (baseline) day.
Now - check out the mirror protest in Portland. I'm linking to Michelle Malkin's site to show some pics of it;
Check out the first pic of the kid with the "Death to America" sign. Then check out the second pic down where they are not only burning the US flag...but an American soldier in effigy.
So much for supporting the troops and not the mission...huh ?
The unmitigated gall to not only diss your country but also the men and women who make it possible to enjoy each day of freedom is beyond my comprehension.
Yup folks. I'm pretty much done with the Sheehan/Fonda anti-war crowd. I no longer question just their judgement. I question their patriotism. Their lack of judgement is just a by-product of their lack of patriotism.
Let me give you some background before going forward.
My brother served in Afghanistan.
I was scared each day that he was over there. My wife will attest that for the year he was in-country I didn't sleep but a few hours at a time. Sometimes I had nightmares where it was just me and him in a foxhole fighting hand-to-hand with Islamists. At one time I was actually swinging at the imaginary islamists in my sleep (according to my wife). Each day I'd pore over news in Afghanistan. One time, I had heard of a US helicopter going down near his base and killing all aboard. I then stayed up all night just to get news that he was ok (he was - but he had been on that helicopter just hours beforehand). When he came home I drove him to Walter Reed Hospital to get treatment for his arm and his neck which were injured on one of his last missions in-country. He has never complained that he had to go (he is a highly successful person with 3 degrees, making 6-figures at his current job but joined the National Guard to do his duty) and hasn't whispered a word to me about the fact that he has endured consistent pain for the past 18 months. In fact he just came home today after surgery to repair the problem with his neck. If his unit is called up to go to Iraq and his neck injury is healed enough, he will go with his unit (he is the company 1rst Sgt). He doesn't necessarily want to be away from his wife and family but he says that as long as he is physically able to do his job, there is no way he's letting "his guys" go over there without him. I know others in his unit who are of the same mind.
These are better men than the "people" above who call themselves "patriots".
On a larger point ... when did we lose our will to support our country as a force for good? When did the supposed "intellectuals" become self-loathing America-bashers?
A patriot to me is one who supports this country and wants to see it do well. Encouraging our defeat and encouraging our enemy are not patriotic in my opinion.
I hate to say this (as I've reached the point of ranting now)... but since I'm worked up, I'm going to state the jingoistic statement here...
"My country ... right or wrong."
I view this country as a force for Good. And I view our actions in the War on Terror will be held in a positive light in history's hindsight. And I will revel in the day when the Rose O-Donnell's and the Sheehan/Fonda's and their anti-war sycophants are held up in the same regard as Benedict Arnold, Tokyo Rose, et al.
Thank you and goodnight.Labels: democrats, idiocy, terrorists, thaiphoon |
| posted by Thaiphoon @ 21:53 | View blog reactions |
|
|
|
| Wednesday, March 7, 2007 |
| Out Damn Spot |
In a bizarre case of 'malpractice' a woman is suing because apparently doctor's were unable to kill her unborn child. (yes I can just hear the 'pro-choice' people screaming that it wasn't a child, bite me)
Since there were two failed attempts at an abortion, this lady thinks the state/doctors/hospital et al. should pony up the money to raise a child. I'd bet that she just can't give up the little girl for adoption (that would be 'cruel' and wouldn't get her a payday).
Boston woman sues for child-rearing costs after failed abortion March 7, 2007 BOSTON --A Boston woman who gave birth after a failed abortion has filed a lawsuit against two doctors and Planned Parenthood seeking the costs of raising her child. The complaint was filed by Jennifer Raper, 45, last week in Suffolk Superior Court and still must be screened by a special panel before it can proceed to trial.Raper claimed in the three-page medical malpractice suit that she found out she was pregnant in March 2004 and decided to have an abortion for financial reasons. Dr. Allison Bryant, a physician working for Planned Parenthood at the time, performed the procedure on April 9, 2004, but it "was not done properly, causing the plaintiff to remain pregnant," according to the complaint. (link)
I can hear the conversation now: "Mommy, why do we have all this money?" "Because the doctor's were too stupid to get rid of you before you were born dear."
Yes I could be more sympathetic to the fact that malpractice did occur, but I do not apologize for thinking that children deserve to be born and live. Pro-choice should be about the child, not the parent.
__________
Reason to wonder
Filed: abortion, idiocy, LordNazhLabels: abortion, idiocy, litigation |
| posted by Lord Nazh @ 08:39 | View blog reactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
